Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147655

Table 4. Comparisons of adjusted KABC-II scores between high and low TCDD exposure groups in 5-year-olds.

Low High
(pg/g lipid) TCDD < 2.5 TCDD ≥ 2.5
Gender Scales Mean SE Mean SE P-value Effect size
Boys Number of subjects 74 16
NVI 90.1 1.6 78.9 3.8 0.010 0.083
Seq/Gsm 102.5 1.9 105.8 4.3 0.508 0.006
Sim/Gv 86.6 1.7 78.3 3.9 0.065 0.043
Sub 1: Conceptual Thinking 6.8 0.32 5.8 0.74 0.244 0.017
Sub 2: Face Recognition 8.8 0.27 7.6 0.63 0.099 0.035
Sub 3: Triangles 10.0 0.35 9.3 0.81 0.434 0.008
Sub 4: Pattern Reasoning 7.1 0.33 5.3 0.79 0.041 0.052
Sub 5: Hand Movements 9.9 0.23 9.2 0.53 0.255 0.017
Sub 6: Number Recall 11.4 0.37 11.8 0.85 0.678 0.002
Sub 7: Word Order 9.3 0.35 10.0 0.81 0.476 0.007
Girls Number of subjects 47 21
NVI 94.3 2.4 95.3 3.8 0.839 0.001
Seq/Gsm 109.3 2.5 107.5 4.0 0.721 0.002
Sim/Gv 88.6 2.5 92.6 3.9 0.420 0.012
Sub 1: Conceptual Thinking 6.8 0.46 7.4 0.73 0.521 0.007
Sub 2: Face Recognition 9.4 0.44 10.6 0.69 0.191 0.003
Sub 3: Triangles 10.8 0.41 10.5 0.65 0.639 0.004
Sub 4: Pattern Reasoning 7.1 0.53 8.7 0.85 0.132 0.040
Sub 5: Hand Movements 10.4 0.36 9.2 0.58 0.117 0.043
Sub 6: Number Recall 13.0 0.48 13.2 0.76 0.872 0.000
Sub 7: Word Order 10.1 0.49 9.3 0.78 0.428 0.011

SE: standard error, Sub: subscale, NVI = Sub 1–5, Seq/Gsm = Sub 6+7, Sim/Gv = Sub 1+2+4

P-value: compared by General Linear Model after adjustment for month-age, gestational age, birth weight of infant, maternal age, family income, parents' education years