Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Sep 4;43(3):474–481. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3179-2

Table 1.

Clinical and biological features and corresponding VMAT1 and VMAT2 expression in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Characteristic Overall N (%) Median VMAT1 Composite Scorea p-value Median VMAT2 Composite Scorea p-value

Age ≥ 18 months 66 (86.8) 60 0.15 203 0.08
Age < 18 months 10 (13.2) 0 10

MYCN Amplified 28 (41.8) 0 0.003 5 < 0.001
MYCN Non-Amplified 39 (58.2) 90 270

Adrenal Primary 43 (56.6) 54 0.56 210 0.07
Non-Adrenal Primary 33 (43.4) 38 102

Catecholamine Positive 61 (83.6) 60 0.12 195 0.11
Catecholamine Negative 12 (16.4) 0 2

Unfavorable Histology 71 (95.9) 54 0.82 153 0.19
Favorable Histology 3 (4.1) 83 297

Un/Poorly Differentiated 59 (89.4) 35 0.48 153 0.74
Differentiating 7 (10.6) 79 195

High MKI 24 (36.4) 0 0.03 0 < 0.001
Low/Intermediate MKI 42 (63.6) 60 248

Hypodiploid/Diploid 39 (57.4) 10 0.07 30 0.009
Hyperdiploid 29 (42.6) 74 240

11q Aberration 6 (42.9) 140 0.10 293 0.02
No 11q Aberration 8 (57.1) 23 70

1p LOH 5 (33.3) 0 0.35 0 0.14
No 1p LOH 10 (66.6) 85 263
a

Composite score is product of intensity score and percent tumor cells positive. VMAT1 data for 74 patients. VMAT2 data for 76 patients.