Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 5;128(13):1809–1814. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.159358

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the association between the VDR gene polymorphism and PD

SNP Model Asian Caucasian


OR 95% CI P I2 (%) OR 95% CI P I2 (%)
ApaI T versus G 0.96 0.85–1.09 0.53 55 1.15 0.90–1.47 0.25 0
TT versus GG 0.82 0.62–1.09 0.17 0 1.35 0.82–2.21 0.24 5
TG versus GG 1.07 0.89–1.30 0.46 66 1.21 0.76–1.91 0.42 7
TT + TG versus GG 1.02 0.85–1.23 0.81 67 1.26 0.82–1.93 0.30 0
TT versus TG + GG 0.82 0.63–1.05 0.11 0 1.17 0.81–1.70 0.40 0
BsmI A versus G 0.88 0.62–1.25 0.47 69 0.97 0.76–1.24 0.26 0
AA versus GG 1.89 0.55–6.46 0.31 0 1.00 0.61–1.65 1.00 0
AG versus GG 0.74 0.50–1.11 0.14 76 0.82 0.55–1.20 0.30 0
AA + AG versus GG 0.80 0.55–1.18 0.26 75 0.86 0.60–1.24 0.42 0
AA versus AG + GG 2.03 0.59–6.98 0.26 0 1.12 0.72–1.73 0.62 0
FokI C versus T 1.34 1.04–1.72 1.61 1.09–2.40
CC versus TT 2.23 1.26–3.95 3.00 1.27–7.08
CT versus TT 2.10 1.19–3.69 2.50 1.06–5.64
CC + CT versus TT 2.16 1.26–3.70 2.68 1.21–5.90
CC versus CT + TT 1.24 0.88–1.75 1.53 0.87–2.69
TaqI C versus T 0.98 0.71–1.35 0.90 0 1.06 0.83–1.36 0.64 7
CC versus TT 0 1.16 0.70–1.93 0.57 0
CT versus TT 0.98 0.71–1.36 0.90 0 0.99 0.77–1.26 0.89 55
CC + CT versus TT 0.98 0.71–1.36 0.90 0 1.03 0.72–1.46 0.88 51
CC versus CT + TT 0 1.18 0.74–1.88 0.50 0

OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; VDR: Vitamin D receptor; PD: Parkinson’s disease; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism.