Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;11(2):1213–1219. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.4032

Table II.

Detailed surgical and histological features of patients in the two study groups.

Variable All patients (n=289) Group A (n=37) Group B (n=252) P-value
Lymph nodes removed, n >0.05
  Mean ± SD 28.8±7.3 29.5±6.6 28.7±7.4
  Range 16.1–41.9
Tumor size, mm <0.001
  Mean ± SD 4.0±0.7 3.3±0.7 4.1±0.6
  Range 2.1–5.8
Endometrial hyperplasia, n (%) <0.01
  Yes   40 (13.8) 11 (29.7)   29 (11.5)
  No 249 (86.2) 26 (70.3) 223 (88.5)
Endometrial polyps, n (%) <0.001
  Yes   42 (14.5) 14 (37.8)   28 (11.1)
  No 247 (85.5) 23 (62.2) 224 (88.9)
Lymphovascular space involvement, n (%) <0.001
  Yes 105 (36.3)   4 (10.8) 101 (40.1)
  No 184 (63.7) 33 (89.2) 151 (59.9)
Lymph node involvement, n (%) <0.05
  Yes   55 (19.0) 2 (5.4)   53 (21.0)
  No 234 (81.0) 35 (94.6) 199 (79.0)
Myometrial involvement <50%, n (%) <0.001
  Yes 106 (36.7) 26 (70.3)   80 (31.7)
  No 183 (63.3) 11 (29.7) 172 (68.3)
Positive peritoneal cytology, n (%) >0.05
  Yes   9 (3.1) 1 (2.7)   8 (3.2)
  No 280 (96.9) 36 (97.3) 244 (96.8)
Tumor grading, n (%) =0.05
  G1 116 (40.1) 19 (51.4)   97 (38.5)
  G2 130 (45.0) 16 (43.2) 114 (45.2)
  G3   43 (14.9) 2 (5.4)   41 (16.3)
Surgical approach, n (%) >0.05
  Laparoscopy   58 (20.1)   8 (21.6)   50 (19.8)
  Laparotomy 231 (79.9) 29 (78.4) 202 (80.2)

Group A, adenomyosis present; Group B, adenomyosis absent; SD, standard deviation.