Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;7:22–31. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.7.3

Table 2.

Comparison of the response time (tresponse) and recovery time (trecovery) between spherical and rod-like pristine and Au-doped ZnO at various NO2 concentrations.

NO2
(ppm)
ZnO
300 °C
Au@ZnO
300 °C
ZnO
550 °C
Au@ZnO
550 °C
tresponse (s)

10 438 ± 30 336 ± 30 132 ± 25 240 ± 20
5 444 ± 30 474 ± 30 240 ± 25 300 ± 20
1 414 ± 30 486 ± 30 360 ± 30 420 ± 20
0.5 336 ± 30 450 ± 30 420 ± 30 450 ± 20

trecovery (s)

10 792 ± 30 342 ± 30 1470 ± 30 654 ± 20
5 984 ± 30 754 ± 30 1320 ± 30 840 ± 20
1 540 ± 30 630 ± 30 1140 ± 30 936 ± 20
0.5 504 ± 30 587 ± 30 900 ± 30 1020 ± 20