Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;4:e1526. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1526

Table 3. The percentage preference for the different dish pairs in Experiment 7, sorted according to preference magnitude.

Note how the column defining whether the dishes were odd or even seems relatively random in terms of order, which implies no relationship between this and strength of Preference.

Items Dish with more elements, by % of participants, is
Dish1 Dish2 Difference Dish1, Dish2, odd or even items Preferred (95% CI) Bigger portion (95% CI)
1 3 2 OO 73 (63.2, 81.39) *** 47 (36.94, 57.24)
2 4 2 EE 70 (60.02, 78.76) ** 40 (30.33, 50.28)
4 5 1 EO 66 (55.85, 75.18) * 42 (47.71, 67.8)
2 3 1 EO 62 (51.75, 71.52) 42 (32.2, 52.29)
1 2 1 OE 62 (51.75, 71.52) 44 (34.08, 54.28)
3 5 1 OO 59 (48.71, 68.74) 50 (39.83, 60.17)
5 6 2 OE 57 (46.71, 66.86) 48 (37.9, 58.22)
4 6 2 EE 57 (46.71, 66.86) 60 (30.33, 50.28)
3 4 1 OE 53 (42.76, 63.06) 47 (36.94, 57.24)
*

p < .05, as derived from Bonferroni-corrected exact Fisher’s tests; 95% CI in brackets.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.