Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):e0147428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147428

Fig 4. uPAR expression measured by optical signal and ELISA assay.

Fig 4

(A) The mean TBR value was significantly different (1.04±0.04 for ICG and 3.52±0.17 for ICG-Glu-Glu-AE105, p<0.0001), while the uPAR expression per mg tissue was almost identical and supports the hypothesis that the difference in ICG-Glu-Glu-AE105 and ICG signal is due to uPAR binding.