Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 6;7(1):139–144. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i1.139

Table 2.

Predictors of iron deficiency anemia investigation n (%)

Variable Univariate analysis1
Multivariate analysis
No iron studies (n = 188) Iron studies (n = 94) P value OR (95%CI)
Anemia documentation2 None 35 (92.1) 3 (7.9) Reference
Before discharge summary 153 (62.7) 91 (37.3) 0.001 8.45 (2.35-30.33)
History of GI bleed None 150 (63.0) 88 (37.0) Reference
Yes 38 (86.4) 6 (13.6) 0.001 0.19 (0.07-0.50)
Hematemesis None 130 (61.6) 81 (38.4) Reference
Yes 58 (81.7) 13 (18.3) 0.003 0.32 (0.15-0.68)
FOBT Negative 56 (62.9) 33 (37.1) < 0.0013 Reference
Positive 59 (55.7) 47 (44.3) 0.07 1.87 (0.95-3.69)
Not performed 73 (83.9) 14 (16.1) 0.005 0.32 (0.14-0.71)
MCV4 90.5 ± 9.4 fL 82.9 ± 19.2 fL < 0.001 0.95 (0.93-0.98)
1

All variables included in multivariable analysis were statistically significant on univariate analysis, including all the variables shown in this table;

2

Anemia documentation on any note including admission, consultation or progress notes but excluding discharge summary;

3

P value for trend;

4

MCV is a continuous variable, so a OR < 1 means that higher MCV was inversely associated with iron deficiency investigation (with every 1 fL increase in MCV there was a 5% decrease in probability of getting iron studies). GI: Gastrointestinal; IDA: Iron deficiency anemia; FOBT: Fecal occult blood testing; MCV: Mean corpuscular volume. Variables included in the multivariable logistic regression but excluded from the table above for being not statistically significant are: Iron supplements on admission, occult bleeding, and lowest hemoglobin. All patients’ characteristics that were not included in the multivariate regression were not significantly different on univariate analysis.