Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 6;7(1):78–90. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i1.78

Table 1.

Summary of studies that have determined prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease

Ref. Type Sample size (CD/UC) Criteria used to define IBD remission Exclusions (IBD characteristics or previous surgery) Criteria used to define IBS IBD-IBS prevalence n (%)
Isgar et al[1] Case-control 98 (0/98) Endoscopic remission, steroid-free Not further specified Manning UC: 33 (33.7)
98 non-IBD controls
Simrén et al[2] Cross-sectional 83 (40/43) CD: Physician global assessment, endoscopic/radiological remission and normal inflammatory markers (Hb, ESR, CRP, platelets, albumin) UC: Endoscopic remission, no blood nor mucus, normal CRP Stenotic CD Gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire validated 37 (44.6)
CD patients with > 2 surgeries CD: 23 (57)
UC: 14 (33)
Significant comorbidities
Zaman et al[43] Cross-sectional 55 (30/25) Stable symptoms, no changes in medication for 3 mo Not available Rome II 35 (63.6)
CD: 20 (66.7)
UC: 15 (60)
Minderhoud et al[44] Case-control 107 (34/73) CD: CDAI < 150 Significant comorbidities Manning Manning: 33 (30.8)
66 non-IBD controls UC: CAIUC < 10 Rome II CD: 8 (23.5)
UC: 25 (34.2)
Rome II: 37 (34.6)
CD: 14 (41.7)
UC: 23 (31.5)
Farrokhyar et al[45] Cross-sectional 149 (105/44) No changes/addition of medication nor change dosage in the last year Not further specified Rome II 31 (20.8)
CD: 27 (26)
UC: 4 (9.1)
Ansari et al[46] Case-control 50 (0/50) Mayo score ≤ 2 (bleeding score = 0, endoscopic score 0-1) Not further specified Rome II UC: 23 (46)
100 non-IBD controls
Keohane et al[33] Cross-sectional 106 (62/44) CD: CDAI < 150 Not further specified Rome II 54 (50.9)
UC: UCAI ≤ 3 CD: 37 (59.7)
For both: physician’s global assessment, CRP < 10 mg/L, no use of steroids or biological agents in previous 6 mo UC: 17 (38.6)
Piche et al[48] Cross-sectional 92 (92/0) CDAI < 150 for > 6 mo, endoscopic/radiologic remission (CDEIS < 6), normal inflammatory markers (CRP, Hb, ESR, platelets, albumin) Stenosis Rome III CD: 42 (45.7)
CD patients with previous surgery
Recent corticoid use
Barratt et al[3] Case-control 276 (110/166) CD: HBI < 5 Not further specified Rome II 31 (11.2)
348 non-IBD controls UC: SCCAI < 5 CD: 14 (12)
UC: 17 (9)
Bryant et al[4] Cross-sectional 93 (47/43)1 Physician’s global assessment using inflammatory markers, histological and endoscopic activity and clinical data Not further specified Rome III 12 (12.9) (no CD/UC differentiation)
Jelsness-Jørgensen et al[49] Cross-sectional 89 (28/61) CD: SCDAI < 4 Not further specified Rome II Rome II: 21 (23.6)
UC: SCCAI < 3 Rome III CD: 6 (21.4)
No current steroid treatment UC: 15 (24.6)
Rome III: 30 (33.7)
CD: 8 (28.6)
UC: 22 (36.1)
Kim et al[50] Cross-sectional 226 (107/119) No changes on therapy in last year, normal limits of CRP, hemoglobin, no blood or mucus in stools for UC CD with stenotic/penetrating phenotype Rome III 82 (36.3)
CD: 50 (46.7)
Previous surgery UC: 32 (26.9)
Berrill et al[5] Cross-sectional 97 (40/57) CD: HBI < 5, CRP < 10 mg/L Ileostomy, colostomy or total colectomy Rome III 31 (32)
UC: SCCAI < 3, CRP < 10 mg/L CD: 13 (32.5)
UC: 18 (31.6)
Jonefjäll et al[35] Pro-spective 94 (0/94) Mayo ≤ 2 (endoscopic < 1) Significant comorbidities Rome II UC: 25 (27)
No relapse during 3 mo before inclusion
Vivinus-Nébot et al[51] Cross-sectional 49 (31/18) CD: CDAI < 150,CDEIS ≤ 4 Stenotic or complicated CD Rome III 18 (36.7)
UC: UCAI ≤ 3, Mayo = 0 CD: 11 (35.4)
For both: physician’s global assessment, CRP < 10 mg/L, no use of steroids over the last year Significant comorbidities UC: 7 (38)
Fukuba et al[52] Case control 172 (0/172) CAI ≤ 4, CRP < 5 mg/L Colectomy Rome III UC: 46 (26.7)
330 non-IBD controls
Total - 1836 (726/1107)1 - - - Total: 567 (30.9)
CD: 259 (38.1)2
UC: 296 (27.8)2
1

In the original article the numbers given by the authors do not add up to the total of patients and they do not specify if the rest correspond to undetermined colitis;

2

For the pooled prevalences in CD and UC, patients from study of Bryant et al have not been included as they do not state a differentiated IBS-IBD prevalence for CD and UC respectively. CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: Ulcerative colitis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; IBS: Irritable bowel disease; CRP: C reactive protein; Hb: Haemoglobin; ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; CAIUC: Clinical activity index for ulcerative colitis; UCAI: Ulcerative colitis activity index; CDEIS: Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity; HBI: Harvey-Bradshaw index; SCCAI: Simple clinical colitis activity index; SCDAI: Simple Crohn’s disease activity index; CAI: Colitis activity index.