Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 19;24(13):3501–3511. doi: 10.1111/mec.13251

Table 2.

Differences in environmental conditions between habitats and sampling dates of the coral Ctenactis echinata

permanova d.f. SS MS Pseudo‐F Unique permutations Monte Carlo P‐value
Shelf 1 15.96 15.96 7.31 998 0.020
Exposure (shelf) 2 2.29 1.14 0.52 999 0.691
Season [exposure(shelf)] 4 144.27 36.07 16.53 999 0.002
Residuals 6 13.09 2.18
Total 13 174
SIMPER
Summer vs. winter average squared distance = 41.06
  Summer average Winter average Av.Sq. Dist. Sq.Dist/SD Contrib %
Temperature (°C) 31.40 25.30 37.60 2.09 91.48
Nearshore vs. offshore average squared distance = 8.21
Nearshore average Offshore average Av.Sq. Dist. Sq.Dist/SD Contrib %
TSM (mg/L) 4.45 2.61 5.00 0.93 60.87
Temperature (°C) 28.80 28.00 2.83 0.89 34.51

Results of the permanova analysis showing differences between ‘shelf’ (i.e. reef locations: nearshore vs. offshore), ‘season’ (i.e. sampling date: summer vs. winter) and ‘exposure’ (i.e. fore‐/back‐reef environment: exposed vs. sheltered). Results of SIMPER analyses showing main factors contributing to a total of >90% of the observed differences between sampling dates and shelf locations, respectively.