Table 3.
Odds ratios for withdrawal and failure rates of traditional versus accelerated and domestic non-university graduates before (2009-2010) and after (2011-2012) the intervention
| Withdrawal rates before (2009-2010) and after (2011-2012) the intervention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Groups | Values | OR (95 % CI) | p-Value |
| 2009 | Traditional vs accelerated | 4 vs 7 % | 1.81 (0.52 to 6.4) | p = 0.35 |
| Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 4 vs 11.9 % | 0.30 (0.095 to 0.983) | p = 0.05 | |
| 2010 | Traditional vs accelerated | 1 vs 8.3 % | 8.61 (1.05 to 70.17) | p = 0.04 |
| Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 1 vs 18.8 % | 0.04 (0.0056 to 0.3286) | p = 0.002 | |
| 2011 | Traditional vs accelerated | 4 vs 2 % | 0.51 (0.091 to 2.852) | p = 0.49 |
| Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 4 vs 4.6 % | 0.79 (0.20 to 3.04) | p = 1.26 | |
| 2012 | Traditional vs accelerated | 1.5 vs 1 % | 0.49 (0.044 to 5.55) | p = 0.56 |
| Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 1.5 vs 3.3 % | 1.51 (0.25 to 9.27) | p = 1.00 | |
| Failure rates before (2009-2010) and after (2011-2012) the intervention | ||||
| 2009 | Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 9 vs 19.4 % | 2.37 (1.02 to 5.53) | p = 0.05 |
| 2010 | Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 6 vs 16.3 % | 2.98 (1.12 to 7.98) | p = 0.03 |
| 2011 | Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 2 vs 5.8 % | 3.13 (0.62 to 15.89) | p = 0.17 |
| 2012 | Traditional vs domestic (non-uni) | 4 vs 6.7 % | 0.85 (0.28 to 2.62) | _p = 0.35 |