Table 3.
Logistical regression analyses for gambling engagement and gambled with problems
Gambling engagement (N = 743) |
Gambled with problems (N = 371) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Exp(B) | B | SE | Exp(B) | |
Gender (Male = 1, Female = 0) | 1.26 *** | 0.17 | 3.53 | 0.85 * | 0.40 | 2.32 |
Depression | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.01 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
Social anxiety | −0.33 ** | 0.10 | 0.72 | 0.54 ** | 0.20 | 1.67 |
Impulsive coping style | −0.16 * | 0.08 | 0.85 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 1.34 |
Risk-taking | 0.08 *** | 0.02 | 1.38 | 0.15 ** | 0.05 | 1.17 |
Sensation seeking | 0.01 | 0.06 | 1.01 | −0.12 | 0.14 | 0.90 |
Age | 0.11 | 0.11 | 1.12 | −0.11 | 0.2 | 0.90 |
Family SES | −0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | −0.01 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
Ethnicity (Asians = 1, Whites = 0) | 0.16 | 0.19 | 1.18 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
Constant | −2.612 | 2.20 | 0.07 | 1.32 | 4.40 | 3.75 |
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001
Bold values indicate significant predictors for the two levels of gambling involvement