Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Gambl Stud. 2013 Jun;29(2):171–189. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9305-1

Table 3.

Logistical regression analyses for gambling engagement and gambled with problems

Gambling engagement
(N = 743)
Gambled with problems
(N = 371)
B SE Exp(B) B SE Exp(B)
Gender (Male = 1, Female = 0) 1.26 *** 0.17 3.53 0.85 * 0.40 2.32
Depression 0.01 0.01 1.01 −0.01 0.01 0.99
Social anxiety −0.33 ** 0.10 0.72 0.54 ** 0.20 1.67
Impulsive coping style −0.16 * 0.08 0.85 0.29 0.15 1.34
Risk-taking 0.08 *** 0.02 1.38 0.15 ** 0.05 1.17
Sensation seeking 0.01 0.06 1.01 −0.12 0.14 0.90
Age 0.11 0.11 1.12 −0.11 0.2 0.90
Family SES −0.00 0.00 0.06 −0.01 0.22 0.90
Ethnicity (Asians = 1, Whites = 0) 0.16 0.19 1.18 −0.01 0.01 0.99
Constant −2.612 2.20 0.07 1.32 4.40 3.75
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001

Bold values indicate significant predictors for the two levels of gambling involvement