Table 2.
Bivariate analysis of prostate cancer screening (complementary log-log).
| Variable | OR (SE) |
|---|---|
| Health insurance (ref: none) | |
| Yes | 6.77 (1.172)∗∗∗ |
| Education (ref: none) | |
| Primary | 2.43 (.976)∗∗ |
| Secondary | 6.75 (2.556)∗∗∗ |
| Higher | 22.64 (9.119)∗∗∗ |
| Discussed health issues with health worker in the last month (ref: none) | |
| Yes | 2.51 (.746)∗∗∗ |
| Listen to radio (ref: none) | |
| Often | 0.38 (.125)∗∗∗ |
| Very often | 0.58 (.196) |
| Watch television (ref: none) | |
| Often | 1.45 (.435) |
| Very often | 1.49 (.391) |
| Age of respondent (ref: 40–44) | |
| 45–49 | 1.38 (.312) |
| 50–54 | 1.87 (.443)∗∗∗ |
| 55–59 | 2.08 (.522)∗∗∗ |
| 60–64 | 2.10 (.556)∗∗∗ |
| Marital status (ref: single) | |
| Married | 3.85 (1.141)∗∗∗ |
| Separated | 2.83 (1.114)∗∗∗ |
| Religion (ref: Catholic) | |
| Protestants | 1.71 (.455)∗∗ |
| ELCIN | 1.19 (.272) |
| Others | 2.14 (.518)∗∗∗ |
| Region of residence (ref: Caprivi) | |
| Erongo | 2.49 (1.331)∗ |
| Hardap | 2.08 (1.150) |
| Karas | 3.00 (1.616)∗∗ |
| Kavango | 1.15 (.727) |
| Khomas | 2.63 (1.466)∗ |
| Kunene | 0.56 (.381) |
| Ohangwena | 2.68 (1.660) |
| Omaheke | 1.46 (.833) |
| Omusati | 0.66 (.451) |
| Oshana | 1.23 (.789) |
| Oshikoto | 1.08 (.694) |
| Otjozondjupa | 2.44 (1.324)∗ |
| Place of residence (ref: urban) | |
| Rural | 0.49 (.091)∗∗∗ |
| Wealth (ref: poorest) | |
| Poorer | 1.16 (.581) |
| Middle | 1.74 (.796) |
| Richer | 4.03 (1.682)∗∗∗ |
| Richest | 13.61 (5.498)∗∗∗ |
Standard errors are in parenthesis. ∗∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗ p < 0.05, and ∗ p < 0.1.