Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;33(11):1646–1654. doi: 10.1002/jor.22947

Table 3.

Participants report of shoe/condition comfort

Mean Comfort Rating compared with participants’ own shoe (10cm VAS, ‐5 to +5)
Condition mean (95% CI), p
Control ‐0.243 (‐0.777 to 0.291), 0.373
Typical lateral wedge 0.844 (0.31 to 1.379), 0.002**
Supported lateral wedge 1.349 (0.814 to 1.883), <0.001***
Mobility shoe 2.403 (1.869 to 2.937), <0.001***
Barefoot 0.464 (‐0.074 to 1.002), 0.091

Asterisks denote magnitude of p‐value as follows:*p <0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Negative value represents report that condition is less comfortable than current shoe whereas positive value represents report that condition is more comfortable. Wedges were placed inside control shoe.