Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 23;114(5):2983–2990. doi: 10.1152/jn.00289.2015

Table 3.

P values of all comparisons between different stimulation site conditions for RFT

P Value
Sham
    TILTEDsham vs. UPsham 0.0001
    TILTEDsham vs. NOsham 0.005
    UPsham vs. NOsham 0.009
V1–V3
    TILTEDV1–V3vs. UPV1–V3 0.015
    TILTEDV1–V3vs. NOV1–V3 0.058
    UPV1–V3vs. NOV1/V2 0.532
rTPJ
TILTEDrTPJvs. UPrTPJ 0.107
    TILTEDrTPJ vs. NOrTPJ 0.697
    UPrTPJ vs. NOrTPJ 0.024

Bonferroni corrected significant P < 0.0014.