. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2016 Jan;40(1):3–11. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.1.1

Table 2.

Adjusted Associations of the Built Food Environment and Dietary Intake

		Dietary Intake Outcomes of Interest
	Number of Stores/Restaurants	Fruit & Vegetable Intake		Fiber Intake^a		Percent Energy from Fat^a

	M (SD)	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p
Within 2-mile Buffer
Fast-food-type restaurants	40.12 (46.13)	.11 (.04)	0.010	.47 (.12)	<0.001	.30 (.12)	0.012
Large grocery stores	3.70 (2.93)	.21 (.61)	0.726	1.02 (1.90)	0.595	1.34 (1.69)	0.431
Convenience-type Stores	7.86 (7.17)	−.56 (.22)	0.014	−1.53 (.71)	0.034	−.46 (.65)	0.481
Within 5-mile Buffer
Fast-food-type restaurants	252.03 (178.89)	.28 (.08)	0.001	.76 (.25)	0.004	.11 (.24)	0.658
Large grocery stores	20.66 (11.09)	1.56 (1.25)	0.218	1.54 (4.01)	0.701	−.18 (3.58)	0.960
Convenience-type stores	23.55 (12.63)	−1.70 (1.01)	0.099	−7.11 (3.18)	0.029	.33 (2.95)	0.911

Note:

Each aspect of the food environment within each buffer area was variance-adjusted prior to analysis and assessed in its own adjusted regression analysis. Covariates were: age, sex, income, education, employment, partner status and census tract. Results are presented without associated covariate information for conciseness.

FI and PEF have a reduced sample size due to N = 2 missing data