Table 1. Comparison of established methods for linking localization and taxonomic identification of microbes to the production of particular metabolites of interest in environmental samples.
Metabolite imaging method | Bacterial visualization method | Metabolite imaging | Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equipment costs | Need for labeling | Versatility (compounds) | Lateral resolution | Sensitivity | |||
Microautoradiography | FISH | $ | Yes | Low | High | Medium | Kindaichi et al., 2004 |
nanoSIMS | FISH/HISH/EL-FISH | $$$$ | Yes | Low | High | High | Orphan et al., 2001; Behrens et al., 2008; Musat et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008 |
(MA)LDI | FISH | $$$ | No | Very high | Medium | Medium | This study |
DESI | FISH | $$ | No | Very high | Low | Low | This study |
Abbreviations: DESI, desorption electrospray ionization; EL-FISH, element labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HISH, halogen in situ hybridization; (MA)LDI, (matrix-assisted) laser desorption/ionization; SIMS, secondary ion mass spectrometry.