Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Aug 10;42(2):169–185. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000163

Table 3.

Summary of Correlation and Results

Measure
Measure 1 2 3 4 5
1. Discrim. slope (with no metamemory judgment) --- .81* .14 .10 .16
2. Discrim. slope (with metamemory judgment) .82* --- .09 .03 .06
3. metamemory judgment −.17 −.04 --- −.01 .16
4. Change in d. slope across metamemory judgments .16 .12 −.15 --- .04
5. working memory composite .31* .37* .04 .28* ---

Note. In the table, the correlations shown above the diagonal are from Experiment 1 (5-item arrays); below the diagonal, from Experiment 2 (7-item arrays). Discrimination (or d.) slope refers to increases in the reported number of changes in the array as a function of increases in the actual number of changes. Working memory composite based on running span and operation span scores.

*

p<.05.