Table 4. The vlPAG resting state functional connectivity in MwoA patients and the changes in different groups.
vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity difference between MwoA patients in baseline and healthy controls |
Changes of vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity in MwoA patients due to acupuncture treatment (verum + sham) |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | ||||
HC>MwoA | 297 | L OFC | −3 | 63 | −18 | 5.81 | Post>Pre | 408 | L MCC | −3 | 27 | 24 | 3.51 |
L mPFC | −6 | 54 | −12 | 3.91 | L mPFC | −9 | 51 | −6 | 3.18 | ||||
L rACC | −12 | 48 | 3 | 2.84 | L rACC | −12 | 51 | 9 | 3.63 | ||||
R mPFC | 6 | 57 | −9 | 3.41 | R MCC | 3 | 18 | 15 | 4.29 | ||||
196 | L OFC | −36 | 21 | −21 | 4.34 | R rACC | 3 | 39 | 15 | 3.31 | |||
MwoA>HC | 236 | Bilateral PAG | 3 | −30 | −15 | 3.55 | Pre >Post | No brain region above the threshold | |||||
Difference between acupuncture treatment group (AG) and WT group in the changes of vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity | Changes of vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity in MwoA patients in WT group | ||||||||||||
AG >WT | 501 | L MCC | 0 | 27 | 12 | 4.11 | Post>Pre | No brain region above the threshold | |||||
L mPFC | −6 | 54 | −6 | 3.24 | Pre>Post | 221 | L Inf Parietal Lob | −39 | −45 | 42 | 3.74 | ||
L rACC | −12 | 51 | 6 | 3.98 | L Precuneus | −33 | −63 | 45 | 3.72 | ||||
R rACC | 6 | 39 | 15 | 3.58 | L Angular gyrus | −33 | −57 | 39 | 3.29 | ||||
WT>AG | No brain region above the threshold |
AG, acupuncture treatment group; L, left side; MCC, middle cingulate cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MwoA, migraine without aura; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; R, right side; SMA, supplementary motor area; VA, verum acupuncture; VAS, visual analogue scale; vlPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray; WT, waiting-list.