Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2012 Aug;164(2):268–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.005

Table II.

Effect of intervention on primary and secondary outcomes

A. Effect of study arm (lottery vs control) on primary outcome: INR out of range
Unadjusted
Adjusted for employment status
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Overall 0.81 (0.53–1.22) .3051 0.93 (0.62–1.41) .7390
INR below at baseline (n = 18) 0.49 (0.25–0.95) .0338 0.39 (0.25–0.62) <.0001
INR in range at baseline (n = 82) 0.99 (0.63–1.58) .9972 1.26 (0.76–2.09) .3744
B. Effect of study arm (lottery vs control) on secondary outcome: nonadherence
Unadjusted
Adjusted for employment status
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Overall 0.78 (0.49–1.25) .3038 0.84 (0.55–1.28) 4138
INR below at baseline (n = 18) 0.53 (0.24–1.17) .1172 0.51 (0.23–1.14) .1016
INR in range at baseline (n = 82) 0.94 (0.57–1.56) .8216 0.99 (0.63–1.59) .9959