Table 8.
Scale | Guangzhou (SE) | Dongguan (SE) | Shenzhen (SE) |
---|---|---|---|
First contact utilization | 2.63 (0.02)∗# | 3.10 (0.04)& | 2.92 (0.04) |
First contact accessibility | 1.67 (0.01)∗# | 1.54 (0.02)& | 1.76 (0.02) |
Ongoing care | 2.70 (0.03)∗# | 2.45 (0.05) | 2.29 (0.04) |
Comprehensiveness | 1.87 (0.02)∗ | 1.60 (0.02)& | 1.83 (0.03) |
Coordination of services | 1.57 (0.02)∗# | 1.80 (0.02)& | 2.17 (0.03) |
Total | 2.09 (0.01)# | 2.10 (0.02) | 2.19 (0.02) |
(a) Significance is indicated at P < 0.05, based on one-way ANOVA (Bonferroni).
(b) ∗Indicating significant differences between Guangzhou and Dongguan.
(c) #Indicating significant differences between Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
(d) &Indicating significant differences between Dongguan and Shenzhen.