Table 2.
Recommendation and evidence quality | Description of supporting evidencea | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Strong recommendation | ||
High-quality evidence | RCT without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studies | Can apply to most patients in most circumstances without reservation |
Moderate-quality evidence | RCT with important limitations or strong evidence from observational studies | Can apply to most patients in most circumstances without reservation |
Low-quality evidence | Observational studies/case studies | May change when higher-quality evidence becomes available |
Weak recommendation | ||
High-quality evidence | RCT without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studies | Best action may differ based on circumstances or patients' values |
Moderate-quality evidence | RCT with important limitations or strong evidence from observational studies | Best action may differ based on circumstances or patients' values |
Low-quality evidence | Observational studies/case studies | Other alternatives may be equally reasonable |
Insufficient | Evidence is conflicting, of poor quality, or lacking | Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against |
This description of supporting evidence refers to therapy, therapeutic strategy, or prevention studies. The description of supporting evidence is different for diagnostic accuracy studies.
RCT, randomized controlled trial.