Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 18;2016:2164609. doi: 10.1155/2016/2164609

Table 5.

Predictive value of clinical and pathological characteristics to Mandard response (univariate analysis).

Variables n Bad responders % (Mandard TRG 3–5) Odds ratio p
Distance from anal verge
 ≤6 cm 86 58.0 1.00 0.017
 >6 cm 81 39.5 2.11 (1.14–3.92)
Mitosis number in resected specimen
 ≤9.5 73 32.9 1.00 <0.001
 ≥9.6 68 77.9 7.21 (3.40–15.32)
Necrosis grade in resected specimen
 Scarce 27 77.8 10.36 (3.76–28.57) <0.001
 Moderate 38 92.1 34.53 (9.76–122.41) <0.001
 Marked 99 25.3 1.00 <0.001
CRM distance
 ≥2 mm 159 45.9 1.00 0.003
 <2 and >1 mm 8 100 2.18 (1.84–2.58)
ypT stage
 0-1 38 7.9 1.00 <0.001
 2–4 129 60.5 17.84 (5.21–61.09)
ypN stage
 0 110 32.7 1.00
 1-2 57 78.9 7.71 (3.64–16.34) <0.001
Pathological stage
 0-I 58 15.5 1.00 <0.001
 II 58 55.2 6.70 (2.78–16.14) <0.001
 III 51 78.4 19.80 (7.47–52.48) <0.001
T downstaging
 Yes 67 23.9 1.00 <0.001
 No 100 65.0 5.92
Pathological TNM downstaging
 Yes 96 34.4 1.00 <0.001
 No 70 67.1 3.90
Reduction of mitosis number
 Yes 83 41.0 1.00 <0.001
 No 52 73.1 3.91 (1.84–8.30)
Differentiation grade in resected specimen
 0 + 1 52 15.4 1.00 <0.001
 2 + 3 115 63.5 9.56