Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 18;2016:2828647. doi: 10.1155/2016/2828647

Table 3.

Statistical comparison for the results obtained by the proposed spectrophotometric methods and the reported method [11]a for the analysis of AA and RU (Ruta C 60) batch number 1210864.

Value Direct A_Sum Iso_RD A_Sum Iso_RD Iso_P RD 1DD MCN RS Reported PLS
method
RU RU RU AA AA AA AA AA AA AA RU AA
Meanb 97.62 99.16 101.29 101.19 98.49 99.38 99.83 98.22 98.54 98.01 100.03 100.40

SD 1.61 2.20 1.75 0.89 1.17 2.03 1.93 2.00 1.93 1.94 3.34 1.92

RSD% 2.00 2.22 1.72 0.88 1.19 2.14 1.93 2.04 1.96 1.98 3.34 1.91

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Variance 2.58 4.83 3.05 0.80 1.36 4.35 3.65 3.99 3.70 3.75 11.14 3.68

F valueb 4.323 (6.388) 2.307 (6.388) 3.649 (6.388) 4.605 (6.388) 2.703 (6.388) 1.119 (6.388) 1.086 (6.388) 1.011 (6.388) 1.008 (6.388) 1.018 (6.388)

t-testb 1.453 (2.447) 0.482 (2.365) 0.752 (2.447) 1.943 (2.447) 1.902 (2.365) 0.820 (2.306) 0.474 (2.306) 1.765 (2.306) 1.535 (2.306) 1.963 (2.306)

aPLS method.

bThe values in the parenthesis are the corresponding theoretical values of t and F at p = 0.05.