Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2015 Oct 16;46(3):529–541. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002020

Appendix Table A1.

Pearson correlations among study variables

Inattention Impulsivity DMS percent accuracy at 0 ms DMS percent accuracy at 4000 ms DMS percent accuracy at 12 000 ms PAL stages completed on first trial PAL first trial memory score SWM strategy SWM between errors RT incongruent – RT congruent SOC problems solved in minimum moves
Inattention 1 0.75*** −0.32*** −0.16 −0.20* −0.25** −0.35***   0.18*   0.30*** −0.22** −0.17*
Impulsivity 1 −0.27*** −0.09 −0.20* −0.13 −0.28***   0.21**   0.20* −0.25** −0.23**
DMS percent accuracy at 0 ms   1   0.16   0.03   0.11   0.19* −0.04 −0.09   0.05   0.12
DMS percent accuracy at 4000 ms   1   0.13   0.26***   0.31***   0.13 −0.17*   0.03   0.01
DMS percent accuracy at 12 000 ms   1   0.17*   0.24**   0.03 −0.21**   0.10   0.14
PAL stages completed on first trial   1   0.79*** −0.03 −0.32*** −0.02   0.19*
PAL first trial memory score   1 −0.08 −0.39***   0.12   0.28***
SWM strategy   1   0.42*** −0.19* −0.24**
SWM between errors   1 −0.20* −0.41***
RT incongruent – RT congruent   1   0.12
SOC problems solved in minimum moves   1

DMS, Delayed Matching to Sample; PAL, Paired Associates Learning; SWM, Spatial Working Memory; RT, reaction time; SOC, Stockings of Cambridge.

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

***

Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).