Appendix Table A1.
Inattention | Impulsivity | DMS percent accuracy at 0 ms | DMS percent accuracy at 4000 ms | DMS percent accuracy at 12 000 ms | PAL stages completed on first trial | PAL first trial memory score | SWM strategy | SWM between errors | RT incongruent – RT congruent | SOC problems solved in minimum moves | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inattention | 1 | 0.75*** | −0.32*** | −0.16 | −0.20* | −0.25** | −0.35*** | 0.18* | 0.30*** | −0.22** | −0.17* |
Impulsivity | 1 | −0.27*** | −0.09 | −0.20* | −0.13 | −0.28*** | 0.21** | 0.20* | −0.25** | −0.23** | |
DMS percent accuracy at 0 ms | 1 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.19* | −0.04 | −0.09 | 0.05 | 0.12 | ||
DMS percent accuracy at 4000 ms | 1 | 0.13 | 0.26*** | 0.31*** | 0.13 | −0.17* | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||
DMS percent accuracy at 12 000 ms | 1 | 0.17* | 0.24** | 0.03 | −0.21** | 0.10 | 0.14 | ||||
PAL stages completed on first trial | 1 | 0.79*** | −0.03 | −0.32*** | −0.02 | 0.19* | |||||
PAL first trial memory score | 1 | −0.08 | −0.39*** | 0.12 | 0.28*** | ||||||
SWM strategy | 1 | 0.42*** | −0.19* | −0.24** | |||||||
SWM between errors | 1 | −0.20* | −0.41*** | ||||||||
RT incongruent – RT congruent | 1 | 0.12 | |||||||||
SOC problems solved in minimum moves | 1 |
DMS, Delayed Matching to Sample; PAL, Paired Associates Learning; SWM, Spatial Working Memory; RT, reaction time; SOC, Stockings of Cambridge.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).