Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2015 Oct 16;46(3):529–541. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002020

Table 3.

EF abilities in the EIG and NIG children

EIG (N=90)
NIG (N=57)
Group difference
Mean S.D. Mean S.D. F p value
DMSa
 Percent accuracy 4000 ms 57.39 23.76 62.81 19.06 2.09   0.15  
 Percent accuracy 12 000 ms 51.82 25.49 65.97 24.77 10.89* 0.001
PAL
 Stages completed on 1st trial 4.89 1.23 5.44 1.10 7.78* 0.006
 First trial memory score 16.32 4.65 18.70 3.76 10.90* 0.001
SWM
 Strategy score 39.45 2.54 37.63 4.43 10.73* 0.001
 Between errors total 67.36 12.85 57.67 15.83 17.40* <0.001
Flanker
 RT incongruent – RT congruent 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.09 10.05* 0.002
SOC
Problems solved in minimum moves 5.55 2.02 6.35 1.72 6.36* 0.013

EF, Executive functioning; EIG, ever institutionalized group; NIG, never institutionalized group; DMS, Delayed Matching to Sample; PAL, Paired Associates Learning; SWM, Spatial Working Memory; RT, reaction time; SOC, Stockings of Cambridge;

*

Significant at the 0.05 level, two-sided test; analyses control for age and gender.

a

DMS statistics are reported only on those subjects who had scores which were greater than expected by chance in the 0-ms delay trials.