Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;8(1):178–185. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.50

Table 2. Comparison of MII-pH variables between patients with refractory GERC who responded to each step of the therapy.

Variable First step (n=29) Second step (n=13) Third step (n=38)
DeMeester score 85.1±18.8*∆ 36.3±15.2 29.9±9.2
SAP for acidic reflux (%) 82.1 (33.4) 76.7 (70.7) 75.3 (39.0)
SAP for nonacidic reflux (%) 61.0 (80.3) 95.5 (18.5) 69.1 (53.0)
Acid reflux (n) 63.7±13.7*∆ 20.7±3.2 21.6±4.1
Weakly acidic reflux (n) 46.8±6.8∆ 45.2±14.6∆ 27.7±7.4
Weakly alkaline reflux (n) 10.7±2.8 16.6±5.0 12.8±4.6
Gas reflux (n) 23.9±8.1 23.9±11.6 28.9±13.9
Liquid reflux (n) 25.1±7.1 21.6±3.4 18.5±3.5
Mixed reflux (n) 76.4±14.7 45.2±12.3 55.4±18.8
Proximal extent (n) 19.3±4.7 18.0±4.3 18.5±4.8
Bolus exposure (%) 1.4±0.2 1.2±0.1 1.3±0.2
Bolus clearance (s) 9.2±2.1 8.4±1.9 7.5±1.7

*, P<0.05 vs. second step; ∆, P<0.05 vs. third step. The data are expressed as mean ± SD except for SAP, which was expressed as median (interquartile). GERC, gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough; SAP, symptom association probability.