Table 5.
Multilevel multinomial logistic regression results of factors associated with the continuum of care (N=18,036)
| Continuum of care
|
||
|---|---|---|
| Characteristic |
Some vs none OR (95% CI) |
All vs none OR (95% CI) |
| Fixed effects | ||
| Age | ||
| 15–19 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 20–24 | 1.48 (1.30, 1.69)*** | 1.75 (1.52, 2.26)*** |
| 25–34 | 1.35 (1.00, 1.82) | 2.09 (1.24, 3.51)** |
| 35–49 | 1.41 (1.10, 1.83)** | 2.86 (1.88, 4.36)*** |
| Parity | ||
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 2–3 | 0.56 (0.44, 0.73)*** | 0.35 (0.25, 0.50)*** |
| 4 + | 0.45 (0.24, 0.86)* | 0.17 (0.08, 0.36)*** |
| Education level | ||
| None | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Primary | 1.83 (1.53, 2.20)*** | 1.45 (1.04, 2.02)* |
| Secondary + | 3.68 (2.70, 5.01)*** | 5.99 (2.68, 13.38)*** |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Rural | 0.81 (0.67, 0.97)* | 0.42 (0.27, 0.65)*** |
| Wealth quintile | ||
| Poorest | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Poorer | 1.44 (1.17, 1.77)*** | 1.82 (1.29, 2.56)*** |
| Middle | 2.20 (1.63, 2.99)*** | 3.58 (2.13, 6.02)*** |
| Richer | 2.85 (2.16, 3.74)*** | 5.89 (3.29, 10.54)*** |
| Richest | 5.79 (4.24, 7.91)*** | 14.18 (6.97, 28.83)*** |
| Decision-making about respondent’s health care | ||
| Wife not involved | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Wife involved | 1.45 (1.21, 1.74)* | 1.12 (0.89, 1.42) |
| Constant | 6.95 (3.97, 12.15)*** | 2.11 (0.76, 5.82) |
| Random effectsa | ||
| Country-level variance (SE)b | 2.67 (0.52)*** | |
| Log likelihood | −11321 | |
| Log likelihood ratio test (χ2)c | 2855.71*** | |
*
p<0.05;
**
p<0.01;
***
p<0.001
a
We assume that the country-level random effects are equal for “Some” and “All” categories; therefore, only one variance estimate is reported for the model.
b
Significance of random effects evaluated by comparing model with a similar one in which random effects have been constrained to be zero.
c
Compared to null model with no covariates.