Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Aug 3;30(3-5):363–381. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1052563

Table 3.

Intervention targets, treatment condition, and change in accuracy

Participant Phase Treatment Target Condition Pretreatment % Accuracy Post-treatment % Accuracy
94 I Initial /ɹ/ (Prosodic Cues) 3 4
II Final /ɹ/ (No Prosodic Cues) 0 2
97 I Final /ɹ/ (No Prosodic Cues) 0 7
II Initial /ɹ/ clusters Prosodic Cues 9 17
103 I Initial /ɹ/ No Prosodic Cues 2 1
II Final /ɹ/ (Prosodic Cues) 0 0

Note: Prosodic cueing was implemented only in Structured Practice, not in Elicitation. Parentheses indicate that the participant did not advance past Elicitation to Structured practice and therefore there was no opportunity to implement the intended prosodic cueing condition. Accuracy was based on average of two independent listeners' scores on 3–4 generalisation probes immediately before and after the treatment phase.