Table 3.
Participant | Phase | Treatment Target | Condition | Pretreatment % Accuracy | Post-treatment % Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
94 | I | Initial /ɹ/ | (Prosodic Cues) | 3 | 4 |
II | Final /ɹ/ | (No Prosodic Cues) | 0 | 2 | |
97 | I | Final /ɹ/ | (No Prosodic Cues) | 0 | 7 |
II | Initial /ɹ/ clusters | Prosodic Cues | 9 | 17 | |
103 | I | Initial /ɹ/ | No Prosodic Cues | 2 | 1 |
II | Final /ɹ/ | (Prosodic Cues) | 0 | 0 |
Note: Prosodic cueing was implemented only in Structured Practice, not in Elicitation. Parentheses indicate that the participant did not advance past Elicitation to Structured practice and therefore there was no opportunity to implement the intended prosodic cueing condition. Accuracy was based on average of two independent listeners' scores on 3–4 generalisation probes immediately before and after the treatment phase.