Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 2;7:10561. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10561

Table 1. Overview of study data sets.

Data Age, years % Male Brain region NGWAS Ncis-eQTL Reference Public availability
Study 1 86±8.0 (55, 105) 38 CRBLM 59 NA Lunnon et al,52 GSE59685
Study 2 48.0±23.2 (16, 96) 70 CRBLM 112 144 Gibbs et al,43 GSE15745GSE36192
      FCTX 144    
      PONS 143    
      TCTX 145    
Study 3 44.3±9.6 (19, 68) 63 CRBLM 147 130 Zhang et al,53 GSE35978GSE38873
Study 4 64.4±17.4 (25, 96) 61 CRBLM 36 NA Pidsley et al,54 GSE61431
Study 5 52.3±29.8 (1, 102) 66 CRBLM 201 219 Hernandez et al,55 GSE36192GSE31694
      FCTX 218    
Study 6 30.7±10.8 (15, 65) 81 Neuron 81 Di Narzo et al,56 NA

CRBLM, cerebellum; FCTX, frontal cortex; NA, not available; Ncis-eQTL, number of participants passing QC available for cis-eQTL analysis; NGWAS, number of participants passing QC available for GWAS analysis; PONS, pons; TCTX, temporal cortex.

— denotes the brain region data were not used for GWAS.

The first five studies involved a total of n=555 individuals that were used in our GWAS of cerebellar epigenetic age acceleration. Study 6 was used for a cis-expression QTL analysis in sorted neurons.