Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 3;9:66. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1332-9

Table 1.

Species composition and measures of infection of the ectoparasites (protozoans and helminths) of Oreochromis niloticus (L.) for the 29 extant farms in Yucatán, México. The calculation of these measures of infection was based on the 580 fish examined across all 29 tilapia farms

Parasite species Infection site Estimated prevalencea (%) Abundance Intensity Intensity Intensity
(CI-95 %) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Median Range
PROTOZOA
Trichodina sp. Skin 41 (36–45) 12.04 ± 49.95 29.3 ± 74.68 10 1–980
Vorticella sp. Skin 8 (5–8) 1.22 ± 7.20 14.88 ± 20.89 6 1–82
MONOGENEA
Cichlidogyrus sclerosus Paperna & Thurston, 1969 Gills 74 (70–77) 73.83 ± 134.29 99.25 ± 147.51 46 1–11178
Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna, 1960 Gills 65 (61–70) 32.35 ± 74.24 51.83 ± 91.52 28 1–885
Cichlidogyrus dossoui Paperna, 1960 Gills 44 (39–48) 8.64 ± 22.82 19.51 ± 31.06 12 1–356
Cichlidogyrus longicornis Paperna & Thurston, 1969 Gills 39 (33–42) 6.36 ± 20.71 16.37 ± 30.69 8 1–246
Cichlidogyrus quaestio Douëllou, 1993 Gills 2 (1–1) 1 ± 0.26 1.7 ± 0.94 2 1–4
Cichlidogyrus sp. Gills 42 (37–46) 15.98 ± 47.99 38.01 ± 68.19 14 1–746
Cichlidogyrus halli (Price & Kirk, 1967) Gills 4 (1–4) 1 ± 3.64 14.6 ± 12.57 7 1–44
Gyrodactylus cichlidarum Paperna, 1968 Fins, skin 31 (26–33) 2.00 ± 8.67 6.49 ± 14.86 9 1–173
Enterogyrus malmbergi Bilong Bilong, 1988 Intestine 13 (10–15) 1.06 ± 9.42 8.02 ± 24.93 3 1–169

aExpected apparent prevalence following [16]

AbbreviationsCI Confidence intervals, SD Standard deviation