Table 4.
Predicting factors of a household with enough ITNs (one net per two people) on survey day among those that received at least one net from a universal coverage campaign
| Factors of associationa | All (n = 3458) | Uganda (n = 491) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR | 95 % CI | P value | Adjusted OR | 95 % CI | P value | |
| UC allocation by sleeping place (vs by people) | 1.63 | 1.07–2.48 | 0.025 | 1.60 | 1.02–2.52 | 0.042 |
| Wealth quintile | ||||||
| Lowest | 1.00 | <0.001 | 1.00 | 0.172 | ||
| Second | 1.09 | 0.78–1.53 | 1.21 | 0.59–2.46 | ||
| Middle | 1.39 | 1.01–1.91 | 1.40 | 0.72–2.71 | ||
| Fourth | 1.66 | 1.19–2.31 | 1.48 | 0.76–2.91 | ||
| Highest | 1.91 | 1.37–2.64 | 2.79 | 1.20–6.53 | ||
| Household of four people or more (vs three or less) | 0.25 | 0.18–0.35 | <0.001 | 0.42 | 0.24–0.76 | 0.005 |
| Household with any child under five (vs no child under five) | 0.37 | 0.30–0.47 | <0.001 | 0.20 | 0.10–0.38 | <0.001 |
CI confidence interval, ITN insecticide-treated net, OR odds ratio, UC universal coverage
aAll models included the survey to reflect the structure of the data (results not shown)