Table 6.
Registration outcomes by delivery and allocation strategy (N = 13,901)
| Location, delivery, and allocation strategy | % of households registered (95 % CI) | N | Among households registered | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % receiving a coupon (95 % CI) | % receiving a least one ITN (95 % CI) | |||
| Fixed-point delivery, fixed allocation (two or three ITNs per household) | ||||
| Kano State, Nigeria | 71.0 (61.7–78.8) | 691 | 99.5 (98.3–99.8) | 89.4 (82.4–93.8) |
| Niger State, Nigeria | 57.5 (54.9–68.3) | 645 | 94.9 (90.6–97.3) | 88.9 (83.1–93.0) |
| Nasarawa State, Nigeria | 83.2 (79.2–86.6) | 724 | 66.3 (56.0–75.1) | 69.8 (59.9–78.2) |
| Ogun State, Nigeria | 62.6 (54.3–70.2) | 496 | 96.0 (92.1–98.0) | 88.0 (80.3–92.9) |
| Anambra State, Nigeria | 80.5 (73.8–85.9) | 830 | 96.3 (92.3–98.3) | 92.3 (87.5–95.4) |
| Sokoto State, Nigeria | 67.3 (58.2–75.3) | 680 | 96.4 (93.3–98.1) | 91.8 (87.6–94.7) |
| Katsina State, Nigeria | 80.8 (72.5–87.0) | 831 | 90.2 (81.4–95.1) | 90.8 (81.9–95.6) |
| Enugu State, Nigeria | 81.2 (77.3–84.6) | 737 | 87.8 (84.6–90.4) | 91.5 (87.4–94.4) |
| Lagos State, Nigeria | 63.6 (55.7–70.9) | 664 | 84.1 (78.2–88.7) | 79.0 (72.5–84.3) |
| South Sudan | 92.6 (88.2–95.4) | 469 | No dataa | 93.5 (90.3–95.7) |
| Fixed-point delivery, universal coverage allocation (one ITN per two persons or one ITN per sleeping space) | ||||
| Cross River State (urban), Nigeria | 59.3 (52.0–66.3) | 152 | 87.1 (65.2–96.1) | 91.2 (86.4–94.3) |
| Senegal | 93.7 (90.9–95.7) | 1367 | 84.0 (78.5–88.4) | 94.8 (92.1–96.7) |
| Uganda | 92.8 (85.3–96.6) | 510 | 78.2 (72.4–83.1) | 96.3 (91.7–98.4) |
| House-to-house delivery, universal coverage allocation (one ITN per two persons or one ITN per sleeping space) | ||||
| Ghana | 94.5 (92.4–96.0) | 955 | n.a. | 96.6 (94.2–98.1) |
| Cross River State (rural), Nigeria | 67.5 (62.9–71.8) | 1102 | n.a. | 95.2 (92.0–97.3) |
CI confidence interval, ITN insecticide-treated net
aData on registration outcome were not collected during the evaluation