Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 2;4:e1646. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1646

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies of poultry consumption and PCa risk.

Author, year, location, design Cases/ controls, n Study period Age at baseline (y) Exposure comparison Relative risk (95% CI)a Statistical adjustment
Mills et al. (1989), USA, Cohort 180/35,000 1976–1982, 6y Range: ≥25 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (≥1 vs. 0 times/w) 1.34 (0.82–2.19) Age
Hsing et al. (1990), USA, Cohort 149/17,633 1966–1986, 20y Median: 51; Range: ≥35 Chicken ; 4th quartile vs. 1 (>4 vs. ≤0.5 times/m) H: 0.90 (0.40–1.80) Age, smoking
Le Marchand et al. (1994), USA, Cohort 198/8,881 1975/1980–1989, 6y Range: ≥45 Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (>139 vs. ≤45 g/w) 1.10 (0.70–1.70) Age, ethnicity, income
Lee et al. (1998), China, PCC 133/265 1989–1992 Range: 50–89 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (NA) 1.12 (0.41–3.52) Crude estimate calculated by original data
Deneo-Pellegrini et al. (1999), Uruguay, HCC 175/233 1994–1997 Range: 40–89 Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (≥53 vs. ≤12 servings/y) 1.30 (0.70–2.40) Age, residence, urban/rural status, education, family history, BMI , total energy intake
Jain et al. (1999), Canada, PCC 617/636 1989–1993 Mean: case 69.8, control 69.9 Chicken; 4th quartile vs. 1 (>44.6 vs. <9.9 g/d) 1.02 (0.77–1.34) Age, total energy, vasectomy, ever-smoked, marital status, study area, BMI, education, ever-used multivitamin supplements in previous 1y, grains, fruit, vegetables, total plants, total carotenoids, folic acid, dietary fiber, conjugated linoleic acid, vitamin E, vitamin C, retinol, total fat, linoleic acid
Sung et al. (1999), Taiwan, HCC 90/180 1995–1996 Range: ≥50 Chicken; yes vs. no (≥1 vs. 0 times/w) 1.73 (0.90–3.31) Matched by age, treatment hospital, date of admission
Allen et al. (2004), Japan, Cohort 196/18,115 1963/1965/1979–1996, 16.9y Mean 51; range: 18–99 Chicken; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (>4 vs. <2 times/w) 0.77 (0.19–3.10) Age, calendar period, city of residence, radiation dose, education
Bosetti et al. (2004), Italy, HCC 1,294/1,451 1991–2002 Median: case 66, control 63; range: 46–74 Poultry; 5th quintile vs. 1 (median 3 vs. 0.5 servings/w) 1.26 (0.98–1.61) Age, study center, education, social class, BMI, family history, total calorie intake
McCann et al. (2005), USA, PCC 433/538 1986–1991 NA Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (>34 vs. ≤13 g/d) 0.97 (0.67–1.39) Age, education, BMI, smoking status
Rovito et al. (2005), USA, HCC 152/161 1998–2001 Mean (s.d.): case 63.07 ± 10.9, control 66.57 ± 9.0; range: 31–88 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (>38 vs. <15 g/d) 0.62 (0.34–1.11) Race, family history; matched by age
Rodriguez et al. (2006), USA, Cohort (Whites) 5,028/64,897 1992–2001, 9y Range: 50–74 Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (≥279 vs. <91 g/w) 1.00 (0.90–1.10) H: 0.70 (0.40–1.10) Age, total calorie intake, BMI, level of education, family history, history of PSA testing, history of diabetes
(Blacks) 85/693 0.70 (0.40–1.30)
Iso & Kubota (2007), Japan, Cohort 169/46,465 1990–2003, 12y Range: ≥40 Chicken; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (≥3 vs. <1 times/w) H: 1.33 (0.81–2.21) Age
Park et al. (2007), USA, Cohort 4,404/82,483 1993–2002, 8y Range: ≥45 Poultry; 5th quintile vs. 1 (median 39.9 vs. 5.9 g/1000 kcal/d) 1.01 (0.92–1.12) H: 1.06 (0.88–1.28) Age, time on study, ethnicity, family history, education, BMI, smoking status, energy intake
Rohrmann et al. (2007), USA, Cohort 199/3,892 1989–2004, 15y Mean: 53.8; range: ≥35 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (≥5 vs. ≤1 times/w) 1.14 (0.77–1.70) H: 0.60 (0.24–1.49) Age, energy intake, saturated fat intake, tomato products intake, BMI at age 21
Allen et al. (2008), 8 European countries, Cohort 2,727/142,251 1989–2007, 8.7y Median: 52; 5th–95th percentile: 33–67 Poultry; 5th quintile vs. 1 (median 32 vs. 9 g/d) 1.12 (0.98–1.27) Age, center, education, marital status, height, weight, energy intake
Amin et al. (2008), Canada, HCC 386/268 2003–2006 Mean (s.d.): 64.5 ± 8.3 Chicken; 4th quartile vs. 1 (4 vs. 1 servings/w) 1.26 (0.58–2.75) H: 1.04 (0.59–1.84) Age, ethnicity, education, family history, smoking, alcohol consumption, sexually transmitted infections, cystitis, prostatitis
Hu et al. (2008), Canada, PCC 1,799/5,039 1994–1997 Range: 20–76 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (NA) 0.50 (0.30–0.90) Age group, province, education, BMI, alcohol use, smoking, vegetable and fruit intake, energy intake
Koutros et al. (2008), USA, Cohort 668/23,080 1993/1997–2003, 8.5y Range: 40–64 Chicken; 5th quintile vs. 1 (median 42.0 vs. 2.8 g/d) 1.04 (0.78–1.39) H: 1.65 (0.90–3.04) Age, state of residence, race, family history, smoking status
Li et al. (2008), China, HCC 28/280 1998–2000 Mean (s.d.): case 71.39 ± 6.03, control 71.14 ± 5.78 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (≥3 vs. <1 times/w) 1.50 (0.48–4.68) Education, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, food frequency (tomatoes, green vegetables, soybean products, beef, pork and milk); matched by age, place of employment
Richman et al. (2011), USA, Cohort 199/27,607 1994–2008, 14y Range: 40–75 Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (≥3.5 vs. <1.5 servings/w) H: 1.15 (0.74–1.78) Age, energy, BMI, smoking, vigorous activity, lycopene intake, eggs; the following factors were considered and omitted for unsubstantial influence: race, family history, history of diabetes, frequency of PSA screening, use of cholesterol lowering drugs, intakes of (dairy, fish, tomato sauce, fresh tomato products, cruciferous vegetables, calcium, and coffee)
Punnen et al. (2011), USA, HCC 470/512 2001–2004 Case 65.8 ± 8.3, control 65.9 ± 8.5 Poultry; 4th quartile vs. 1 (median 2 vs. 0.25 servings/w) 0.70 (0.49–1.02) H: 0.70 (0.49–1.02) Age, race, institution, energy intake
Deneo-Pellegrini et al. (2012), Uruguay, HCC 326/652 1996–2004 Range: 40–89 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (NA) 0.92 (0.64–1.32) Age, residence, urban/rural status, education, BMI, family history, total energy intake, other types of meat
Joshi et al. (2012), USA, PCC 1,854/1,094 1997–1997, 1999–2003 Range: 40–79 Poultry; 5th quintile vs. 1 (≥35.7 vs. <7.9 g/1000 kcal/d) 0.80 (0.63–1.01) H: 0.90 (0.60–1.20) Crude estimate calculated by original data
Mahmood et al. (2012), Pakistan, HCC 195/390 2011 Case 69.77 ± 4.9; control 68.09 ± 5.5 Chicken; 5th quintile vs. 1 (>3 vs. 0 times/w) 0.54 (0.08–3.33) Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking status, family history, height, physical activity
Stott-Miller, Neuhouser & Stanford (2013), USA, PCC 1,549/1,492 1993–1996, 2002–2005 Range: 35–74 Poultry; 3rd tertile vs. 1 (≥4 vs. <1 times/m) 1.30 (1.04–1.62) H: 1.30 (0.97–1.75) Age, race, family history, BMI, PSA/DRE tests in previous 5y, education

Notes.

Abbreviations are as follows:

PCC
population-based case-control study
HCC
hospital-based case-control study
H
high stage PCa
BMI
body mass index
PSA
prostate-specific antigen
DER
digital rectal examination
s.d.
standard deviation
y
years
m
month
w
week
d
day
NA
not available
a

Risk ratio, hazard ratio or odds ratio.