Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 9;6(35):37500–37510. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6061

Table 1. Characteristics of the nine include studies in this meta-analysis.

Study Country Year Sample size Sample type Assay method Cut off value TP FP FN TN
Konety BR USA 2000 106 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 53 0 2 51
Van Le TS USA 2005 140 Urine Sandwich immunoassay OD=0.04 67 3 8 62
Chen TE China 2005 76 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 33 0 2 41
Guo B China 2011 155 Urine QPCR 13 A /ug 65 14 7 69
Feng CC China 2011 136 Urine ELISA test 1.7×10−4A 74 0 2 60
Jiang MJ China 2013 88 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 28 0 2 58
Huang YH China 2014 82 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 49 1 7 25
Wang XP China 2014 156 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 42 0 4 110
Yang JR China 2015 180 Urine ELISA test 13 A /ug 75 0 5 100

ELISA, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; QPCR, Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; OD, Absorbance units; TP, true positive; FP, false-positive; TN, true negative; FN, false-negative.