Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 12;6(34):36587–36602. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5500

Table 2. Fusion transcripts detected by the RACE-seq approach.

Gene A Gene B Break position A Break position B Split reads* Spanning reads* In Frame Probability score Validated§ Sample
VTI1A TCF7L2 Chr10: 114,220,341 Chr10: 114,900,943 1234 163 Yes 0.96 Previously reported NCI-H508
TCF7L2 RP11–57H14.3 Chr10: 114,799,885 Chr10: 114,648,494 114 41 No 0.95 Previously reported HCT-116
VWA2 TCF7L2 Chr10: 116,014,807 Chr10: 114,900,943 206 67 Yes 0.98 Yes Sample 17_T
DHX35 BPIFA2 Chr20: 37,632,550 Chr20: 31,767,410 862 4 Yes 0.23 Yes Sample 16_T
CASZ1 MASP2 Chr1: 10,820,757 Chr1: 11,090,938 107 NA Yes NA Yes Sample 4_T

Both previously known as well as novel fusion transcripts were detected by the RACE-seq approach and subsequent analysis of paired-end sequencing reads. Only the top-scoring nominated candidates are shown for each fusion pair. The known as well as the novel fusion transcripts VWA2-TCF7L2 and DHX35-BPIFA2 were nominated by the fusion detection software, whereas the novel CASZ1-MASP2 was detected by the Unix utility grep and scaffold realignment.

*

The number of split reads and spanning reads supporting the fusion junction, determined from the fusion detection software or scaffold realignment for the CASZ1-MASP2 fusion (split reads contain the fusion boundary in the read itself, whereas spanning reads are paired ends that harbor the fusion boundary within the insert sequence).

Probability score determined by the fusion detection software.

§

Two fusion genes involving TCF7L2 have previously been reported and served as positive control fusion targets for the RACE-seq. The novel fusions were validated by Sanger sequencing.