Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Jan 1;1(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.09.008

Figure 1. Composite & Regional CB1R Availability in cannabis Dependent subjects compared to Healthy Controls at Baseline.

Figure 1

A: Composite [11C]OMAR VT

The figure on the left shows the mean and standard error bars of composite [11C]OMAR VT in Cannabis Dependent subjects (n=11) (red) compared to Healthy Controls (n=21) (green). Statistically significant group differences are indicated with *. Below the figure on the left are grand averaged Grand Averaged [11C]OMAR VT in CDs (left) vs. HCs (right) at Baseline.

B: Regional [11C]OMAR VT

The figure on the right shows the mean and standard error bars of regional [11C]OMAR VT in Cannabis Dependent subjects (red) compared to Healthy Controls (green) across different brain regions. Statistically significant group differences are indicated with *. Trend level group differences are indicated with #.