Table 4.
Model | Full Model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model Fit | ||||
χ2(df) | 257.77 (46), p<.05 | |||
RMSEA (C.I.) | .05 (.04 – .05) | |||
CFI | .97 | |||
| ||||
Caregiving | Play | |||
| ||||
Intercept | Slope | Intercept | Slope | |
| ||||
Est (s.e.) | Est (s.e.) | Est (s.e.) | Est (s.e.) | |
Father Role Ident. | .25*** (.03) | .18*** (.03) | .20*** (.02) | .15*** (.03) |
Father Dep. | −.07 (.06) | −.01 (.06) | −.06 (.05) | −.09 (.06) |
Mother Dep. | .25*** (.06) | .11 (.07) | −.001 (.06) | .09 (.06) |
Marital Conflict | −.02 (.06) | −.09 (.07) | −.09 (.06) | −.14* (.06) |
Mother Play | .05 (.03) | .03 (.03) | .26*** (.02) | .15*** (.03) |
Infant Gender | −.03 (.07) | −.17* (.08) | .06 (.07) | −.04 (.07) |
Infant Temp. | −.09 (.06) | .02 (.07) | −.08 (.06) | −.10 (.06) |
Father Dep X MC | .09 (.06) | −.01 (.07) | .04 (.06) | .10 (.06) |
Mother Dep X MC | −.25** (.07) | −.07 (.08) | −.06 (.07) | −.10 (.07) |
Temp X MC | .10 (.08) | .06 (.09) | .10 (.08) | .08 (.08) |
Gender X MC | −.05 (.06) | .02 (.07) | −.05 (.06) | .02 (.06) |
Gender X Temp | −.03 (.06) | .01 (.07) | .04 (.06) | .04 (.06) |
| ||||
Correlations between latent intercepts and slopes | ||||
| ||||
1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | |
1. Caregiving Intercept | 1.00 | |||
2. Caregiving Slope | .71*** | 1.00 | ||
3. Play Intercept | .40*** | .29*** | 1.00 | |
4. Play Slope | .35*** | .60*** | .74*** | 1.00 |
Note:
p<.05,
p<.01,
p<.001.
Temp = Infant Temperament, Ident. = Identification, Dep = Depressive symptoms, MC = Marital Conflict. Mother working hours at T1, SES, father minority status, and the number of siblings in the household at each time point were included in each analysis as covariates.