Table 4.
Logistic regression results predicting gentrification on Asian and Hispanic populationsa
| No Controls | Asian and Hispanic Presence | Homogeneous Neighborhoods | × % Black | Ethnic Enclaves | × City Immigration Levels | × City Black Presence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
| Asian Population (logged) | 0.293** (0.031) | 0.179** (0.034) | 0.166** (0.034) | 0.201** (0.043) | 0.173** (0.038) | 0.053 (0.065) | 0.231** (0.046) |
| Hispanic Population (logged) | –0.096* (0.038) | –0.050 (0.050) | –0.085 (0.055) | 0.003 (0.059) | 0.073 (0.055) | 0.040 (0.072) | –0.008 (0.073) |
| % Black | –0.020** (0.002) | –0.015** (0.003) | –0.010** (0.003) | –0.013** (0.003) | –0.019** (0.003) | –0.015** (0.003) | –0.015** (0.003) |
| % black × Asians | 0.002 (0.001) | ||||||
| % black × Hispanics | 0.004** (0.001) | ||||||
| Predominantly Black (>95 %) | –1.590** (0.463) | ||||||
| Predominantly White (>95 %) | 0.131 (0.301) | ||||||
| Asian Enclave (>40 %) | –2.076** (0.529) | ||||||
| Hispanic Enclave (>40 %) | –1.949** (0.295) | ||||||
| City Types | |||||||
| Asian destination | –0.160 (0.198) | –0.117 (0.199) | –0.132 (0.200) | –0.198 (0.198) | –0.264 (0.201) | –0.198 (0.203) | |
| Hispanic destination | 0.143 (0.209) | 0.229 (0.211) | 0.220 (0.212) | 0.432* (0.211) | 0.121 (0.208) | 0.133 (0.216) | |
| Black presence | 0.342* (0.152) | 0.340* (0.152) | 0.333* (0.152) | 0.350* (0.157) | 0.370* (0.155) | 0.439** (0.166) | |
| Interactions With City Types | |||||||
| Asian destination × Asians | 0.160* (0.074) | ||||||
| Hispanic destination × Hispanics | –0.164† (0.092) | ||||||
| Black presence × Asians | –0.117† (0.069) | ||||||
| Black presence × Hispanics | –0.056 (0.086) | ||||||
| AIC | 1,688 | 1,495 | 1,483 | 1,489 | 1,424 | 1,491 | 1,495 |
a
N = 2,087. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. All variables are 24 years prior to gentrification field surveys. Models 1–6 also include controls for median household income (logged), % below poverty, % same residents 10 years ago, homeownership rate, vacancy rate, and % over 65 years old. Interaction term variables are mean-centered.
†
p < .10
*
p < .05
**
p < .01 (two-tailed test)