Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;10:24. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00024

Table 6.

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis of the relationships between ASD status and TASIT part 2 (social inference-minimal) controlling for Hayling, LNS and employment status (n = 82).

Variable B β sr² p 95% CI
Constant −5.66 [−6.95, −4.36]
STEP 1
Hayling 0.125 0.38 0.13 <0.001*** [0.06, 0.19]
LNS 0.07 0.18 0.02 0.09 [−0.01, 0.15]
Employmenta −0.36 −0.13 0.01 0.21 [−0.92, 0.21]
STEP 2
Hayling 0.08 0.24 0.04 0.029* [0.01, 0.15]
LNS 0.05 0.12 0.01 0.23 [−0.03, 0.12]
Employment −0.10 −0.04 0.001 0.71 [−0.66, 0.45]
ASD statusb 0.81 0.36 0.09 0.002** [0.31, 1.31]
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001.

a

Employment: 1, Employed/Student; 2, Unemployed.

b

ASD status: 1, ASD; 2, Control.