Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 4;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z

Table 2.

Design accumulation rates and actual excreta filling rates

Design/Place Filling rates litres/capita/annum (l/c/a) Reference
Design accumulation rates
EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [16] and R Franceys, et al. [15] 40 Wet pits where degradable anal cleansing material is used
60 Wet pits where non degradable anal cleansing material is used
60 Dry pits where degradable anal cleansing material is used
90 Dry pits where non degradable anal cleansing material is used
Reported pit latrine filling rates
EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [18] and R Franceys, et al. [15] 25 (ablution water used) 35 Wet pit West Bengal, India
EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [18] 40 (solid cleansing material) Philippines
PR Morgan, et al. [57] 20 Zimbabwe PR Morgan, et al. [94]
R Franceys, et al. [15] 42 USA
47 Brazil
JN Bhagwan, et al. [110] 24.1 (mean) Soshongove, South Africa
69.4 (mean) JN Bhagwan, et al. [110] Bester’s Camp, South Africa
18.5 (mean) Mbila, South Africa
27.5 (implied) Gabarone, Dares salaam
29 (median) Mbazwana, South Africa
34 (median) Inadi, South Africa
DA Still and K Foxon [53] 39 (median) Limpopo, South Africa
48 (median) Mafunze, South Africa
21 (median) Ezimangweni, South Africa
19 (mean) eThekwine, South Africa