Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 4;9:67. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1346-3

Table 2.

Summary of data relating deltamethrin resistance phenotype to kdr genotype per town

V1016I F1534C Double homozygotes
Town Deltamethrin Phenotype n V/V V/I I/I Freq. I p F/F F/C C/C Freq. C p V/V & F/F I/I & C/C
San Lorenzo susceptible 52 0 38 14 0.63 0 8 44 0.92 0 13
resistant 31 1 4 26 0.9 <.0001 1 0 30 0.97 0.012 1 26
Total 83 1 42 40 0.74 1 8 74 0.94 1 39
Acanceh susceptible 72 19 45 8 0.42 7 40 25 0.63 7 8
resistant 10 0 0 10 1.0 <.0001 0 0 10 1.0 <.0001 0 10
Total 82 19 45 18 0.49 7 40 35 0.67 7 18
Progreso susceptible 66 10 27 29 0.64 0 8 58 0.94 0 29
resistant 24 0 7 17 0.85 0.0021 0 0 24 1.0 0.074 0 17
Total 90 10 34 46 0.7 0 8 82 0.96 0 46
Hunucma susceptible 77 18 54 5 0.42 8 56 13 0.53 8 5
resistant 11 0 2 9 0.91 <.0001 0 0 11 1.0 <.0001 0 9
Total 88 18 56 14 0.48 8 56 24 0.59 8 14
Conkal susceptible 70 8 45 17 0.56 7 39 24 0.62 4 15
resistant 9 0 1 8 0.94 <.0001 0 1 8 0.93 0.051 0 8
Total 79 8 46 25 0.61 7 40 32 0.66 4 23
TOTAL susceptible 337 55 209 73 22 151 164 19 70
resistant 85 1 14 70 1 1 83 1 70
Total 422 56 223 143 23 152 247 20 140

n = number of individuals tested for kdr genotype from each community; V/V and F/F are SS (homozygous susceptible); V/I and F/C are SR (heterozygotes); I/I and C/C are RR (homozygous resistant)