Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Graph Stat. 2014 Sep 17;24(4):954–974. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2014.956876

Table 3.

Performance as a function of n, p and T. Means (standard deviations) over 100 replicates are shown for five criteria defined in Section 3.1. The tuning parameter λ was selected by using aBIC criterion.

Setting Tuning parameter Comparison criteria

p nt T Penalty type log10 2 λ/nt Criterion C1 Criterion C2 Criterion C3 Criterion C4 Criterion C5
500 150 5 f1, ν = 0.5 −1.0 173.98 (20.58) 1355.98 (52.67) 155.88 (16.92) 406.22 (15.79) 0.66 (0.01)
500 150 5 f2, ν = 1 −1.4 699.42 (47.57) 1970.92 (60.20) 439.58 (26.00) 488.00 (15.13) 0.49 (0.01)
500 150 5 f3, ν = 2 −1.9 404.38 (44.84) 1981.66 (67.37) 168.32 (16.62) 437.74 (15.77) 0.48 (0.01)

500 150 2 f1, ν = 0.5 −1.1 313.90 (26.22) 393.72 (25.70) 299.38 (24.33) 257.20 (16.58) 0.78 (0.02)
500 150 2 f2, ν = 1 −1.5 343.98 (30.90) 448.36 (28.54) 293.58 (24.61) 264.82 (17.02) 0.72 (0.02)
500 150 2 f3, ν = 2 −2.3 659.60 (181.48) 527.50 (33.94) 476.40 (156.66) 291.80 (20.66) 0.85 (0.04)

1000 150 2 f1, ν = 0.5 −0.8 132.76 (17.06) 383.10 (24.56) 131.78 (16.84) 285.26 (16.42) 0.91 (0.01)
1000 150 2 f2, ν = 1 −1.2 527.52 (35.33) 625.80 (29.85) 502.08 (33.42) 408.60 (19.34) 0.81 (0.01)
1000 150 2 f3, ν = 2 −2.2 4195.08 (97.95) 1079.98 (39.09) 3648.30 (82.54) 642.00 (25.28) 0.97 (0.02)

1000 500 2 f1, ν = 0.5 −1.5 1774.14 (65.72) 2481.38 (32.03) 1674.50 (60.00) 1445.36 (20.29) 0.29 (0.01)
1000 500 2 f2, ν = 1 −2.0 1301.30 (60.64) 2519.94 (34.97) 1072.66 (46.47) 1417.20 (21.53) 0.24 (0.01)
1000 500 2 f3, ν = 2 −3.0 1920.64 (74.52) 2611.12 (35.09) 1273.74 (47.60) 1434.72 (20.99) 0.26 (0.01)