Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 13;88(1053):20140817. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140817

Table 2.

MR and MR arthrography detection of acetabular chondral defects compared with arthroscopy

Acetabular chondral defect Acetabular chondral defects True positive True negative False positive False negative Sensitivity compared with arthroscopy (%) Specificity compared with arthroscopy (%)
Defect on arthroscopy 32 32 11 0 0 100 100
Defect on 3.0-T MR Reader 1 21 21 11 0 11 65 100
Defect on 3.0-T MR Reader 2 19 19 11 0 13 59 100
Defect on 3.0-T MR arthrogram Reader 1 27 26 10 1 6 81 91
Defect on 3.0-T MR arthrogram Reader 2 25 23 9 2 9 71 82