Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep 21;30(4):911–929. doi: 10.1037/pag0000046

Table 2.

Selection Model Identification by Sample Size and Selection Model, Simulation A

Covariate flagged as significant (rejection rate)
Covariate used in tree
t tests
Logistic
CART
CART + Prune
v z w v z w v z w v z w
N = 100
 Linear   .612 .041 .052   .611 .054 .042   .914   .710   .698   .876 .396 .387
 One split   .944 .052 .058   .943 .049 .047   .997   .428   .408   .989 .065 .063
 Two splits   .892 .539 .056   .926 .049 .620   .991   .903   .219   .964 .699 .055
 Three splits   .044 .371 .593   .046 .616 .393   .848   .796   .943   .576 .597 .828
N = 250
 Linear   .786 .050 .054   .783 .064 .053   .996   .924   .912   .97 .482 .483
 One split   .999 .051 .048   .999 .047 .041 1.000   .545   .539 1.000 .033 .034
 Two splits 1.000 .922 .044 1.000 .052 .958 1.000   .997   .518   .993 .838 .081
 Three splits   .048 .734 .884   .054 .896 .777   .999   .996 1.000   .902 .804 .964
N = 500
 Linear   .929 .053 .052   .928 .048 .054   .978   .811   .816   .966 .477 .482
 One split 1.000 .053 .060 1.000 .054 .042 1.000   .306   .316 1.000 .018 .018
 Two splits 1.000 .996 .044 1.000 .044 .999 1.000 1.000   .484   .999 .911 .070
 Three splits   .076 .959 .989   .078 .991 .972 1.000 1.000 1.000   .993 .901 .998

Note. CART = classification and regression trees; Prune = pruned CART analysis. Table entries indicate the percentage of simulated iterations that each variable was either flagged as statistically significant (t-tests, logistic regression) or included as a split variable (CART, CART + Prune).