Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;113(4):886–891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504020112

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of estimated dates of initial megafaunal decline using generalized linear model analyses of taphonomically corrected spacing lengths for (A) EB, (B) the CUSA, and (C) SA. Inverse spacings (°) and inverse estimated mean lengths (—) are on a scale proportional to frequency of occurrence and are labeled as relative intensity. Times of descent (EB = 14,661; CUSA = 13,001; SA = 12,967 BP) correspond to estimated onset of decline for each region.