Fig. 5.

Subsequent memory analysis of generic pattern similarity in the hippocampus. (A) Activity patterns for each encoding trial in phase 2 were extracted from each ROI. Trials were then binned according to memory in phase 3. (B) Within each task at encoding (art and room), the activity patterns for all subsequent hits were correlated with one another and the activity patterns for all subsequent misses were correlated with one another, controlling for their similarity to the task-relevant attentional-state template. These partial correlations were then averaged across tasks separately for hits and misses. (C) There was no similarity difference for hits vs. misses in any hippocampal subfield or in the hippocampus as a whole. Error bars depict ±1 SEM of the within-participant hits vs. misses difference.