Table 3. Bone Mineral Density Assessment Technique.
Statements | Level of Evidence* | Median Response | n/N (%)1 |
---|---|---|---|
Where local normative data exists, measure the bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density in the total body minus the cranial bones (headless), and the postero-anterior lumbar spine | 1 | Agree | 17/18 (94.4) |
Total hip and proximal femur bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density measurements are not considered a reliable site for measurement due to difficulties with subject positioning | 1 | Agree | 14/17 (82.4) |
Z scores should be calculated from raw values for the following: | |||
Age | 2 | Agree | 22/24 (91.7) |
Height | 2 | Agree | 23/23 (100) |
Bone mineral apparent density (or volumetric bone mass density) adjustment is also recommended where possible | 1 | Agree | 21/21 (100) |
The same skeletal sites should be assessed when repeating densitometry measures longitudinally | 4 | Agree | 27/27 (100) |
In individuals with spinal rods, the bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density for the lateral distal femur and the total body minus the cranial bones (headless) should be measured | 4 | Agree | 17/17 (100) |
To reduce unnecessary movement during bone mineral density scan procedures, calming techniques such as music, the presence of carers/parents, swaddling or sedation may be used | 4 | Agree | 31/31 (100) |
Where possible densitometry measurements of lean tissue mass should be assessed | 2 | Agree | 16/17 (94.1) |
*Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network
1Numerator is the number of responses with median response or 1 category either side and denominator is the number of clinicians in the panel whose expertise were relevant to this item