Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148222

Table 1. Statistical analysis of assay performance.

# compounds screened S:Na S:Bb SWc Z’d % nCVintere % nCVintraf % pCVinterg % pCVintrah
3,200 34.67 4.98 4.47 0.55 9.78 5.46 ± 2.3 11.49 6.30 ± 1.2
12,800 27.94 5.81 5.55 0.58 8.65 2.51 ± 1.1 17.21 4.51 ± 4.6
12,800 44.08 5.7 4.67 0.57 10.02 2.06 ± 0.8 10.67 2.70 ± 1.5
3,520 29.59 5.51 5.48 0.58 8.67 3.28 ± 2.0 15.24 5.49 ± 2.6
7,680 46.51 6.13 5.27 0.6 9.47 4.61 ± 0.7 11.04 6.64 ± 3.1
Average ± SD 36.56 ± 8.4 5.63 ± 0.4 5.09 ± 0.5 0.58 ± 0.02 9.32 ± 0.6 3.58 ± 1.4 13.13 ± 2.9 5.13 ± 1.6

aSignal to noise ratio is a measure of signal strength

bSignal to background ratio

cSignal Window is a measure in the difference in signal between negative and positive controls

dZ-factor is a measurement of the performance of the assay under the defined conditions

e,f Inter- and Intra-plate, respectively, variability for negative control.

g,h Inter- and Intra-plate variability, respectively, for positive control.