Table 1. Statistical analysis of assay performance.
# compounds screened | S:Na | S:Bb | SWc | Z’d | % nCVintere | % nCVintraf | % pCVinterg | % pCVintrah |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,200 | 34.67 | 4.98 | 4.47 | 0.55 | 9.78 | 5.46 ± 2.3 | 11.49 | 6.30 ± 1.2 |
12,800 | 27.94 | 5.81 | 5.55 | 0.58 | 8.65 | 2.51 ± 1.1 | 17.21 | 4.51 ± 4.6 |
12,800 | 44.08 | 5.7 | 4.67 | 0.57 | 10.02 | 2.06 ± 0.8 | 10.67 | 2.70 ± 1.5 |
3,520 | 29.59 | 5.51 | 5.48 | 0.58 | 8.67 | 3.28 ± 2.0 | 15.24 | 5.49 ± 2.6 |
7,680 | 46.51 | 6.13 | 5.27 | 0.6 | 9.47 | 4.61 ± 0.7 | 11.04 | 6.64 ± 3.1 |
Average ± SD | 36.56 ± 8.4 | 5.63 ± 0.4 | 5.09 ± 0.5 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 9.32 ± 0.6 | 3.58 ± 1.4 | 13.13 ± 2.9 | 5.13 ± 1.6 |
aSignal to noise ratio is a measure of signal strength
bSignal to background ratio
cSignal Window is a measure in the difference in signal between negative and positive controls
dZ-factor is a measurement of the performance of the assay under the defined conditions
e,f Inter- and Intra-plate, respectively, variability for negative control.
g,h Inter- and Intra-plate variability, respectively, for positive control.